Legal Opinion

Vazquez v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 22, 2008No. AC 28504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BERDON, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction (commissioner), appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting relief to the petitioner, Anderson Vazquez, on count one of his habeas petition and ordering a new trial. The commissioner claims that the court (1) abused its discretion by denying her petition for certification to appeal and (2) improperly concluded that the petitioner’s trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to present an alibi defense. We dismiss the appeal.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our review…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Louis Eze v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spearman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Meletrich v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Ramey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API