Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*152 *811 The petitioner, Leon Bell, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 The habeas court denied the petition after concluding that, although the petitioner was entitled to a jury instruction in accordance with the seminal case of State v. Salamon , 287 Conn. 509 , 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), that failure was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the habeas court correctly concluded that the absence of a Salamon instruction in the petitioner's criminal trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. In…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Banks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Bell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Bell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. PrudhommeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022