Legal Opinion
Pierson v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 28, 1964No. [App. No. 114, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.
This is an application for leave to appeal from an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore dated September 27, 1963, committing applicant to the Patuxent Institution under the provisions of Code (1963 Cum. Supp.), Article 31B, after a verdict of a jury finding him to be a defective delinquent.
The basis for observation and examination of applicant was his conviction on January 15, 1962, of burglary, for which he was sentenced to serve not more than three years in the Maryland State Reformatory for Males (now Maryland Institution for Men) and from which he was referred to Patuxent Institution.
C…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Schultz v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hazell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Rice v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Washington v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.