Legal Opinion

Rice v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 12, 1965No. [App. No. 100, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

This nineteen year old applicant, who had been previously convicted of housebreaking, was subsequently found to be a defective delinquent by a jury, and now seeks leave to appeal.

In a petition filed in proper person, the applicant, claiming that he is not a defective delinquent within the meaning of the statute and that his detention as such is a denial of equal protection and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, contends that he is mentally retarded and should be confined in Rosewood State Hospital rather than at the Patuxent Institution. He also claims that the presiding judge at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Owens v. Wilmer Ex Rel. Eastern Shore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gray v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. William L. McDonough v. Director of PatuxentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Bingman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API