Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 28, 1964No. [App. No. 148, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.
Applicant had been found to be a defective delinquent by a jury in January 1961 and was committed to Patuxent Institution. He subsequently filed a request for redetermination, and after a hearing held on December 20, 1963 before Judge Byrnes without a jury, at which applicant was represented by counsel, he was found still to be a defective delinquent. From the order recommitting him to Patuxent Institution he has requested leave to appeal.
Through his court appointed counsel he raises the following contentions:
1. The State’s only witness, Dr. Boslow, testified from reports made by others of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Queen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Pierson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Bush v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Washington v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.