Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
After a jury, in the Circuit Court for Talbot County, found applicant to be a defective delinquent and he was committed to the Patuxent Institution, he requested leave to appeal.
He raises six contentions:
1. Your petitioner was never examined by Dr. Boslow, the only witness appearing against him, except at one staff meeting; any examination he received never lasted more than fifteen minutes.
2. That the jury’s finding that your petitioner was a defective delinquent was in error in that it was contrary to the evidence and against the weight of the evidence.
3. That your petitioner’s assigned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claude O. Jones, Jr. v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Barbee v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Smallwood v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Schultz v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Crews v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
- Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.