Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 1963No. [App. No. 31, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

After a jury, in the Circuit Court for Talbot County, found applicant to be a defective delinquent and he was committed to the Patuxent Institution, he requested leave to appeal.

He raises six contentions:

1. Your petitioner was never examined by Dr. Boslow, the only witness appearing against him, except at one staff meeting; any examination he received never lasted more than fifteen minutes.

2. That the jury’s finding that your petitioner was a defective delinquent was in error in that it was contrary to the evidence and against the weight of the evidence.

3. That your petitioner’s assigned…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claude O. Jones, Jr. v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Barbee v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Smallwood v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  5. Schultz v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Crews v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  4. Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API