Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 25, 1962No. [App. No. 53, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bruñe, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In proceedings under the Defective Delinquent Law, Code (1961 Cum. Supp.), Article 31B, the applicant, William L. McDonough, was found by a jury to be a defective delinquent and was ordered to be committed to the Patuxent Institution for an indeterminate period, without maximum or minimum, limits. He seeks leave to appeal. 1
It is somewhat difficult even to summarize the lengthy and largely repetitious documents filed by the applicant. His contentions seem to fall into four groups, which may be summarized as follows; first, that the Defective…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Howard v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Apple v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Blizzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sas v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- John Sas v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution, Albert Delanor Murel v. State of Maryland and Director of Patuxent Institution, James C. Shine v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution and the Maryland State Legislature, Timothy Patrick O'COnnOr v. State of Maryland Director, Patuxent Institution, George L. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Crews v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- In the Matter of CromwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- William L. McDonough v. Director of PatuxentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.