Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 1962No. [App. No. 38, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This application for leave to appeal is from an order recommitting the applicant to Patuxent Institution after a jury had found him to be a defective delinquent on July 20, 1961.

In 1955 the applicant was found guilty of perverted practice, given a two-year suspended sentence, and placed on probation for three years. The following year he was convicted of housebreaking and given a two-year sentence. He was admitted to Patuxent on March 3, 1956. On January 27, 1957, he was found to be a defective delinquent by the Criminal Court of Baltimore. The present application arises out of a request for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Queen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Fairbanks v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Ambrose v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. In the Matter of CromwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API