Legal Opinion

Villaflores v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2008No. S-12499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After Clarito Villaflores applied for a job with ConocoPhillips and was not hired, he filed a complaint with the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, alleging discrimination based on age and race. The commission, through staff, determined that Villaflores’s complaint was not supported by substantial evidence because Villaflores was not qualified for the job, and because Cono-coPhillips had not known Villaflores’s race and hired an applicant of the same age class as Villaflores. In seeking reconsideration, Villaflores disputed the commission’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gary Millbrook v. Ibp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. Yellow CabAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Raad v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Villaflores v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Grundberg v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API