Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. Yellow Cab
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
In this case, we must consider the requirements for a prima facie case of sex discrimination in an action brought against a private company. We hold that the correct test was utilized by the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (hereinafter “Commission”), and find that there is substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Wendy Mayer, the real party in interest, established each element of a prima facie case. Consequently, we reinstate the Commission’s decision, which was reversed by the superior court, that appellee, Yellow Cab, discriminated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Saul MacKlin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc. Saul MacKlin v. Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 639Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Miller v. Safeway, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Moody-Herrera v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.