Legal Opinion
Horvath v. Thompson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 23, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-2157 ESHPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, who was employed in 1997 as a staff attorney at the Department of Health and Human Services’ (“HHS”) Departmental Appeals Board (“DAB”), has filed a pro se reverse gender discrimination suit against his employer, 1 alleging his non-selection for promotion to Chief of the DAB’s Civil Remedies Division (“CRD”) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Defendant has moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff has failed to present sufficient facts to permit a reasonable jury to conclude…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sewell v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pearsall v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Hammond v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.