Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 10, 2005No. CIV.A.03-2407 JDBPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary E. Hammond filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended (“Title VII”), alleging that defendant Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor (“defendant” or “DOL”), discriminated against her on the basis of her race and sex when it selected a white male applicant to fill the position of Lead Manpower Development Specialist. Plaintiff also alleges that defendant retaliated against her when it failed to submit a supervisory assessment for plaintiff, which was a prerequisite to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Manuel v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hamilton v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Washington v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Kelly v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.