Legal Opinion
Pearsall v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 2009No. Civil Action 07-0108 (PLF)PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This is an employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). Plaintiff Albert Pearsall brings suit against his long-time employer, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), alleging retaliation and discrimination on the basis of race, gender and age in violation of Title VII and the ADEA. DOJ has moved to dismiss Mr. Pearsall’s claims pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Glass v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dorns v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.