Legal Opinion
Warner v. Vance-Cooks
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1306PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Kimberly Warner, who is currently employed as the Chief of the Digital Print Center (“DPC”), a unit of the Plant Operations Division of the Government Printing Office (“GPO”), 1 initiated this action against GPO’s Chief Executive Officer, in his official capacity, alleging a “pattern of sex discrimination and retaliation” in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Complaint, ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”), ¶ 1. 2 Over the last decade, this plaintiff has had a fraught employment history…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Paul v. Postgraduate Center for Mental HealthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Morales v. GotbaumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kilby-Robb v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Dyer v. McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurants, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.