Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Kastner

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 14552PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In this action the trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the injury for which plaintiff sought to recover damages was proximately caused by her negligence and failure to exercise ordinary care for her own safety. Plaintiff struck her head with great violence against a projecting rafter of defendant’s garage, which rafter she failed to observe, and thereby sustained injuries to her neck and spine, including a chip fracture of the fifth cervical vertebra.

Both plaintiff and defendant reside in the block bounded by Torrey Road, Prospect Street, Virginia Way and Exchange Street in La…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. O'Neill v. City of Port JervisNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Deane v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Coates v. ChinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API