Legal Opinion
San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2002No. S091757PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Plaintiffs, the owners and operators of the San Remo Hotel in San Francisco, sought approval from the City and County of San Francisco to rent all rooms in the San Remo Hotel to tourists or other daily renters, rather than to longer term residents. Plaintiffs eventually received approval but, in the process, were required to (1) comply with zoning laws by obtaining a conditional use permit for use of their property as a tourist hotel, and (2) help replace the residential units San Francisco claimed would be lost by the conversion, pursuant to the city’s Residential Hotel…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BuenrostroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.