Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Bruce
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1953No. Civ. 19657PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by defendant from an interlocutory judgment adjudging that plaintiff is entitled to a divorce. The court found that on September 23, 1946, defendant willfully and without cause deserted plaintiff, and that the desertion continued more than one year.
The specifications of error are: 1. The findings are not supported by evidence. 2. The place of living chosen by plaintiff was not reasonable. 3. The court should have permitted the answer to be amended. 4. Plaintiff failed to prove and corroborate jurisdictional grounds. 5. “ Attorney’s Pees. ’ ’
The parties were married in 1918.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Newlands v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Betzer v. OlneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rogers Brothers Co. v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robison v. HanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Adler v. BlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Kapelus v. Family Health FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969