Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1955No. Crim. 5322PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Ford and Leakes were charged, with one Randolph, in three counts with kidnapping for the purpose of robbery, robbery, and burglary. Ford and Leakes were found guilty by a jury as charged in each count. Randolph was acquitted on all counts. Ford and Leakes, referred to as defendants, appeal from the judgment and the order denying their motions for a new trial.

Defendants’ specifications of error are: 1. Venue was not established. 2. The evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions. 3. The court erred in refusing to give their requested cautionary instruction with respect to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. BemisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. DeloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. McGregarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. KutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. HarvathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. IknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API