Legal Opinion
Betzer v. Olney
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1936No. Civ. 1753PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to recover upon a broker’s bond for $5,000, issued in accordance with the requirements of subdivision 3 of section 6 of the Corporate Securities Act, as amended (Stats. 1931, p. 944). The action involves three transactions had by the plaintiff and cross-complainants, respectively, with the brokerage firm of W. P. Smith & Company, for which firm the corporate defendants had furnished the bond in question. The trustee of the bankrupt estate of W. P. Smith & Company filed a complaint in intervention, claiming the right to administer any amount recovered upon the bond. The court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwards v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Rogers Brothers Co. v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Walsh v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Krueger v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Chatterton v. BooneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- In The Matter Of Buna Painting & Drywall Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.