Legal Opinion

Newlands v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1916No. L. A. No. 4240PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an original petition for mandate to compel the superior court of Los Angeles County and the Honorable Charles Monroe, judge thereof, to grant the petitioner alimony pendente lite, attorneys’ fees and costs, grow ing out of the matter of her proposed appeal from the judgment and deoree of divorce awarded against her.

By his answer respondent shows that petitioner, Viola New-lands, brought her action against her husband, Joseph R. Newlands, on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1914. She charged that the defendant abandoned her in the city of New Orleans on the third day of April, 1911,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lacey v. LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Bales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wittman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Marr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API