Legal Opinion

Adler v. Blair

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1959No. Civ. 23477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from a judgment denying a third party claim.

Plaintiff Adler brought suit against Jack Blair to recover in excess of $6,750. An attachment issued and was levied on an automatic laundry business, referred to as the “North Broadway Store.” Dorothy Blair filed a third party claim. On stipulation, the attachment was released and the property sold. Plaintiff Adler filed an undertaking in double the value of the property levied on.

After a hearing the court found that Jack Blair was the part owner and entitled to a share in the possession of the property attached at the time of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watwood v. SteurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. J. P. Loubet Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Bruhnke v. Bowlus-Teller Mfg. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ehrlich v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Sherwood v. CornfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Earle v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API