Legal Opinion
Taback v. Arai
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 2, 1927No. 3609PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court refusing to discharge the bankrupts.
Louis Taback and Nathan Taback, under the firm name of the Taback Bros., were dealers in raw and thrown silk. From some time in 1917 to May 1, 1920, their place of business was at 1133 Broadway, New York City, and from May to September, Í920, it was in Paterson, N. J. For a time the bankrupts conducted a prosperous business, but in 1920 one of the worst panics known in the silk industry occurred, and the price of raw silk dropped from around $15 to $4.50 per pound. The bankrupts had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In re Utica Pipe Foundry Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- In re FeldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- In re AllendorfDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1904
- In re MackenzieDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re RussellDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1931
- Schock v. MalloyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- In re RosenfieldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- In re ServelDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1928
- Rifkin v. Krause (In re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980