Rifkin v. Krause (In re Krause)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
There are two complaints before us in the case at bar. The first raises objections to the bankrupts’ discharge under Section 14c of the Bankruptcy Act. The second seeks a determination of the nondischargeability of the debt owed by the bankrupts to the objecting creditor under Section 17a of the Act. We conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the complaint objecting to the discharge of the bankrupts under Section 14c and, therefore, we will grant the bankrupts a discharge. Similarly, we find that there is not enough evidence to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Martin M. Decker and Kathleen H. Decker, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. Appeal of Martin M. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Angel R. Santana v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- In Re HochbergDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- Taback v. AraiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927