In re Utica Pipe Foundry Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Iii Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Utica Pipe Foundry Company, bankrupt. On application by the trustee in bankruptcy for confirmation of the report of the special master, disallowing and dismissing the claims of Charles A. Xardell and Joseph A. Xardell, respectively, and application by said claimants, on exceptions filed to the report of the special master, for an order setting aside or .refusing to confirm, such report, and allowing such claims.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The claimant Charles A. Xardell presented a verified claim against the bankrupt corporation for $3,330 for damages for breach of contract of employment, alleging that a valid contract was made, and that the corporation without cause or reason violated same by refusing to employ him or allowing him to perform under his said contract and agreement. The claimant Joseph A. Xardell presents a similar claim for the sum of $1,500.
*788As these claims were unliquidated, on application to the court an order was made for their liquidation before Frederick J. De La Fleur as special…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In re Simon & SternbergDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1907
- Wheeler v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- In re HodgeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
- In re New York & Philadelphia Package Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Taback v. AraiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- In re FeuerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1926
- In re ShiffDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.