In re Mackenzie
District Court, D. Connecticut
In Bankruptcy. On petitions for discharge. The following is the report of John W. Banks, Referee in Bankruptcy : 1. Said Frank W. Mackenzie and Howard E. Mackenzie, both of Bethel, in Fairfield county, in said district, were duly adjudged bankrupts on the 21st day of November, 1898. 2. On the 10th day of June, 1899, each of said bankrupts filed with said referee his petition for discharge in accordance with the practice then prevailing in this district. 3. On the 21st day of…
Read the full summary
In Bankruptcy. On petitions for discharge. The following is the report of John W. Banks, Referee in Bankruptcy : 1. Said Frank W. Mackenzie and Howard E. Mackenzie, both of Bethel, in Fairfield county, in said district, were duly adjudged bankrupts on the 21st day of November, 1898. 2. On the 10th day of June, 1899, each of said bankrupts filed with said referee his petition for discharge in accordance with the practice then prevailing in this district. 3. On the 21st day of June, 1899, I mailed to each known creditor of each of said bankrupts a notice containing the substance of said…
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
The report of the referee, to whose ability and fairness it gives me pleasure to attest, and the voluminous insistence of counsel for the creditors, have induced a very careful examination of the record. Having done soj I am ready to state briefly how the matter strikes me. It ought, in my opinion, to be counted against me for blame if I should disregard his advice. His conclusions of fact, of course, I must accept. As to errors of law, I can find no evidence wrongfully admitted which can have injured the creditors, and no evidence wrongfully rejected which could have…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Taback v. AraiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Hurley v. DevlinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1907
- In re ServelDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1928