Legal Opinion
In re Rosenfield
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1932No. 16685PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This motion is in opposition to the bankrupt’s application for discharge. Section 14b (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 USCA § 32 (b) (3) contains the restriction on discharge claimed to be applicable here. These facts must occur to make it so applicable: (1) The statement must be in writing; (2) the statement must be materially false; (3) the statement must be given with the purpose to obtain credit; (4) credit must be given on the faith of the statement.
The statement in question was in writing. The statement was eoneededly given with the purpose to obtain credit, and I am…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- FARMERS'SAV. BANK OF GRIMES, IOWA v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- In re PerlmutterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
- In re SmithDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
- Taback v. AraiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Scales v. A. L. Stone & SonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North Park Credit v. Harmer (In Re Harmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
- In Re SlohmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Rutland Savings Bank v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1980