Bullard v. Kempff
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco dissolving a preliminary injunction. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendants from destroying or removing a bulkhead or retaining wall erected along the westerly side of her lot. Upon filing her complaint, a preliminary injunction was granted. The defendants answered, and upon their answer and affidavits moved for a dissolution of the injunction. The plaintiff filed affidavits in reply, and upon the hearing an order was made dissolving the injunction, and from that order the plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff and defendant Cornelia respectively own adjacent lots in the city of San Francisco, and this controversy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Hunt v. SteeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- LeCompte v. LuedersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Beall v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Washington Water Power Co. v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Long v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Woodland v. HodsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.