Legal Opinion

LeCompte v. Lueders

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action of trespass was commenced in' *496justice's court, where plea of title was interposed, and! the cause certified to the circuit. Upon trial there, defendant had verdict and judgment.

The parties are the owners of adjoining lots of land in McGraft & Montgomery's addition to the village of' Lakeside, now a part of the city of Muskegon. Plaintiff owns and is in possession of lot 2, block 5, and the defendant owns and is in possession of lot 1 ‘of the same block. The two lots adjoin, and the action grows out of a dispute as to the true boundary line between the lots.

Block 5, with other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wood v. StarkoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Akin v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  4. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Wirostek v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API