Hunt v. Steese
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Yuba County refusing an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Ejectment. Plaintiff moved for an injunction pendente lite, restraining the defendants from washing away the soil for mining purposes. The court granted a temporary restraining order, but on the hearing of the motion, refused to grant an injunction, and the order first made was revoked.
On the hearing plaintiff introduced his verified complaint, and a patent for certain lands, including the lands in controversy, from the United States to the Central Pacific Railroad Company, issued under a grant to that company by act of Congress passed July 1, 1862, and the amendment thereto of July 2,1864.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yount v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Hess v. WinderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Burdge v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lenard v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Porter v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schwartz v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bullard v. KempffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Blue Bird Mining Co. v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.