Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Liscom

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1868PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

The plaintiff in his complaint substantially avers, that, one Light, in 1849, being then the owner of the premises described, conveyed them to one Harris, by deed- absolute in terms, hut coupled with a defeasance and a covenant that the same should be void on payment to said Harris of a certain sum of money according to conditions specified; that on nonpayment of the money, in accordance with said terms, said Harris, in a suit against said Light, in 1850, foreclosed said mortgage, and in March, 1851, purchased in the premises under the judgment of foreclosure; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Calkins v. CalkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Cunningham v. Hawkins.California Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Calkins v. . IsbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  3. Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API