Legal Opinion

Long v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1909No. Civ. No. 590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, dissolving a temporary injunction. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant, Pacific Loan Association, is a building and loan corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of this state.

On the 30th of April, 1901, the plaintiff, having borrowed from said defendant the sum of $4,200, on the general plan of building and loan concerns, executed and delivered to said defendant her promissory note in said amount, payable ten years after date, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum. For the purpose in part of securing the payment of said loan, the plaintiff executed a deed of trust to a certain lot or piece of real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bullard v. KempffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstone v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Robertson v. DodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co. v. Mike-Ron Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Wilbur v. GriffinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API