Smith v. City of Goldsboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN for mandamus by tlie plaintiff to compel the City of Goldsboro to appoint an arbitrator in pursuance of its charter and ordinances to assess damages claimed by plaintiff for use of his streets, heard before Robinson, J., at Chambers in Goldsboro in September, 1897. Prom a judgment for plaintiff defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Douglas, J.:
This is a proceeding for a mandamus to compel the defendant municipal corporation to appoint an arbitrator, in accordance with its ordinances and charter, to assess the damages claimed by the plaintiff for the additional servitude imposed upon certain streets, the fee of which was alleged to be in the plaintiff. There seems to have been no question as to the facts, as'no issues were submitted or asked to be submitted to the jury. The Court held as a conclusion of law that'the defendant should appoint an arbitrator as prayed in the complaint. The essential facts appear as follows:
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Neal v. . BecknellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Atlantic, Tennessee & Ohio Railroad v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bank of Tarboro v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Sexton v. . Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Hester v. Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Mayo v. Commissioners of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.