Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Port City Properties, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 2007No. 102,834PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
T1 Plaintiff/Appellant Phillip Estrada (Plaintiff) seeks review of the trial court's order granting the demurrer to the evidence/motion for directed verdict of Defendant/Appellee Port City Properties, Inc., d/b/a Hodges Warehouse (Defendant), on Plaintiffs claim for wrongful, retaliatory termination of his employment. In this appeal, Plaintiff asserts he presented evidence establishing a prima facie case for recovery. Having reviewed the record, we agree. The order of the trial court is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
12…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Thompson v. Medley Material Handling, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Wallace v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Kennedy v. BUILDERS WAREHOUSE, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- HAYES v. NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021