Legal Opinion

Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 2011No. 107,552Published

1Opinion of the Court

258 P.3d 495 (2011)

2011 OK 30

Philip ESTRADA, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a, Hodges Warehouse, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 107,552.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 19, 2011.

Robert V. Seacat, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Kenneth L. Brune, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Defendant/Appellant.

KAUGER, J:

¶ 1 The dispositive issues presented[1] are whether: 1) the trial court erred in submitting the issue of punitive damages to the jury after it had determined that there was no evidence presented which would warrant punitive damages; 2) the collateral source rule applies to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API