Legal Opinion

Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 2011No. 107,552PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J:

T1 The dispositive issues presented 1 are whether: 1) the trial court erred in submitting the issue of punitive damages to the jury after it had determined that there was no evidence presented which would warrant punitive damages; 2) the collateral source rule applies to retaliatory discharge proceedings when financial hardship is alleged; and 3) the actual damages awarded were excessive under the evidence presented. We hold that: 1) because no evidence was presented which would warrant a punitive damages award, the trial court erred in submitting the issue to the jury; 2) the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Grassmann v. Brown (In re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  3. NYE v. BNSF RAILWAY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. C&H POWER LINE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API