Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Halliburton Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1993No. 70351PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.

Three issues are presented for our consideration. The first question is whether the trial court erred in overruling Appellants’ motion for a directed verdict and new trial. We must then determine if the jury should have been permitted to award punitive damages and if so, whether the correct statute was applied. Finally, we must resolve the question of whether Appellee was entitled to attorneys fees.

Jeffery Paul Wallace (Claimant/Appel-lee), an employee of Halliburton, (Defendant/Appellant) was injured on the job on January 8, 1985. On February 16, 1985, Wallace…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Thompson v. Medley Material Handling, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Webb v. DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER CO. ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Elzey v. ForrestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Adair v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Upton v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API