Legal Opinion

Buckner v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1988No. 65197PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The questions presented are 1) whether a worker who obtains medical treatment from a physician provided by the employer at the job situs has instituted proceedings under 85 O.S.1981 § 5, 1 thus triggering the threshold requisites for stating a prima facie case for retaliatory discharge, and; 2) whether either of the parties complied with 12 O.S.Supp.1985 Ch. 2, App., District Court Rule 13. We find that: 1) because the term institution of proceedings is broader than the term filing or commencing a claim, the employee stated a prima facie case under 85 O.S. 1981 § 5; and 2) the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Adair v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Joe L. White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API