Buckner v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
The questions presented are 1) whether a worker who obtains medical treatment from a physician provided by the employer at the job situs has instituted proceedings under 85 O.S.1981 § 5, 1 thus triggering the threshold requisites for stating a prima facie case for retaliatory discharge, and; 2) whether either of the parties complied with 12 O.S.Supp.1985 Ch. 2, App., District Court Rule 13. We find that: 1) because the term institution of proceedings is broader than the term filing or commencing a claim, the employee stated a prima facie case under 85 O.S. 1981 § 5; and 2) the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Adair v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Joe L. White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.