Legal Opinion
State v. Piorkowski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 1995No. 13537PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a)1 rendered after he entered a plea of *254nolo contendere. He appeals from the judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a* 2 and Practice Book § 40033 and asserts that the trial court improperly-denied his motion to suppress two statements that he gave to Norwalk police officers.
*255The state claims that we do not have subject matter jurisdiction because (1) § 54-94a does not permit a conditional plea of nolo contendere and appeal on the grounds asserted in the defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PalkimasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ireland v. IrelandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.