Legal Opinion

State v. Palkimas

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 1, 2009No. AC 29043PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Richard Palkimas, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court following a plea of nolo contendere to criminal violation of a protective order in violation of General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to accept his plea of nolo contendere because, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-38c (g), the charge of criminal violation of a protective order was dismissed once he successfully completed the classroom component of the family violence education program (program). We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. State v. DaytonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Scott v. Lipman & Katz, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. State v. JosephConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API