State v. Palkimas
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Richard Palkimas, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court following a plea of nolo contendere to criminal violation of a protective order in violation of General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to accept his plea of nolo contendere because, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-38c (g), the charge of criminal violation of a protective order was dismissed once he successfully completed the classroom component of the family violence education program (program). We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. DaytonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Scott v. Lipman & Katz, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. JosephConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015