Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Bedding Co. v. Graebner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The respondent contends that this action may be maintained upon two theories, one of which is that the conversation between Miss Graebner and Mr. ..Schilling amounted to an oral contract of insurance between Graeb-ner and the Bedding Company by which Graebner agreed to *176insure the company for the period of one year from' the 24th day of February, 1920. This theory cannot be sustained, for the reason that sub. 2, sec. 1941 — 64m, Stats., expressly prohibits the issuance of contracts of fire insurance by any except authorized fire insurance companies, in the following language:

“No unauthorized…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Croft v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kleis v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. Rainer v. SchulteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Hamacher v. TUMYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Kiviniemi v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API