Michigan Pipe Co. v. Michigan Fire & Marine Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is an action upon two policies of insurance, dated, respectively, July 2 and 3, 1890, for $2,500 each, upon lumber claimed to have been the property of ■ the plaintiff, and situated upon two docks in East Tawas, Mich. The property insured was consumed by fire on the night of July 5 following. One J. H. Schmeck was the defendant’s agent at East Tawas at this time, and was authorized to—
“Receive proposals for insurance against loss or damage by fire, * * * to fix rates of premium, to receive moneys, and to countersign, issue, renew, and consent to the transfer of policies of insurance, * *…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Insurance Co. v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lightbody v. North American InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Perkins v. Washington InsuranceCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Todd v. German American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Phœnix Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Waterloo Lumber Co. v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- El Dia Ins. Co. v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Milwaukee Bedding Co. v. GraebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.