Legal Opinion
Hamacher v. TUMY
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1960PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff brings this action against Earl S. Tumy and Gilbert S. Tumy, co-partners, engaged in a general insurance agency business, to recover damages resulting from the alleged failure of the defendants to procure insurance on certain buildings and equipment owned by plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from a verdict and judgment for the defendants.
The plaintiff is the owner of a sawmill and planing min in Jackson County, Oregon. The mill was originally owned by Talent Sawmills, Inc., a corporation. The corporation was dissolved in the summer of 1955 and all of the assets were distributed to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Burroughs v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- De Grove v. . Metropolitan Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bulla v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Duncanson v. Service First, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.