Legal Opinion
Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1937No. 4282PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
From a judgment for $2,500 in favor of appellee (plaintiff below) this appeal is prosecuted. The parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant” as in the district court.
At the close of plaintiff’s testimony in the district court, the defendant moved for judgment, which motion was overruled. The defendant announced that it would stand on its motion; thereupon the district court entered judgment for plaintiff.
The findings of the court support the judgment, and if there is substantial evidence to support the findings of the court it must be affirmed. The motion called for…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Helvering v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Chevron Oil Co. v. Sutton Ex Rel. SuttonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Vickers v. North American Land Developments, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Pribble v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Mascarenas v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.