Turlock Theatre Co. v. Laws
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff sued Elwood P. Laws, A. Blumenfeld, Joe Blumenfeld, and several fictitious defendants, to recover alleged unpaid rentals under a lease of a moving picture theater in Turlock, Stanislaus County; also to terminate the lease and to be restored to possession of the property. The action was commenced in Stanislaus County on June 2, 1938. The defendants specifically named were served with summons. Within due time they filed a demurrer and a notice of motion for change of place of trial to the city and county of San Francisco, the place of their residences. The motion was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.