Legal Opinion

Goossen v. Clifton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1946No. Civ. Ho. 13072PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a change of venue from the county of Santa Clara to the county of Los Angeles. On application of defendants for a writ of supersedeas an order to show cause and a temporary stay of proceedings were granted. (Civ. 13054.)

The complaint is in two counts. In the first count the plaintiff seeks to recover upon a mutual, open and current book account in the sum of $17,500.08, which sum is the claimed balance due and owing to plaintiff for the maintenance, management and supervision, between May 1, 1942, and April 15, 1943, of fifteen Ford…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API