Paramore v. Colby
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Loe Angeles County. Russ Avery, Judge. Affirmed, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
[1] In- this action the plaintiffs recovered judgment for the amount of certain installments due and unpaid as part of the purchase price provided in a- contract of sale of- real property. Appellant contends that such action is -necessarily an action to compel specific performance of the contract; that, therefore, the complaint does not state a cause of action because it does not contain any allegations of fact showing that the contract is as to the defendant fair, just and reasonable. (Civ. Code, sec. 3391.) It appears to be settled law that such an action brought merely to recover money due…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- O'Hara v. WattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Samuel v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Amaranth Land Co. v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rench v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bonner v. FinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- O'Gorman v. WachterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.