Samuel v. Allen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— This appeal is from the judgment, but was taken within sixty days after the rendition and entry thereof.
The action is brought to recover money due upon a contract for the sale of land. The plaintiff, who is the vendor, avers *407that he has performed all the conditions of the contract on his part, and that on the seventeenth day of January, 1890, the defendant refused to accept performance on his part, and notified plaintiff of his refusal to accept performance on the part of plaintiff and still does refuse to accept performance.
These allegations are specifically deñied in the answer.…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gallup v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- North Stockton Town Lot Co. v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Longmaid v. CoulterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.