Legal Opinion

Miller v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1919No. 10177PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Ambrose Miller and another against O. R. Howard and another to cancel a deed. From judgment for defendants, tfie plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

On October 31, 1914, Am-brose Miller, an enrolled member of tfie Creek Nation, of one-eigfitfi Indian blood, entered into a written agreement with O. R. Howard to convey to tfie said O. R. Howard, for and in consideration of tfie sum of $28,000.00, an undivided one-fialf interest in and to his allotment of land in Creek county, Oklahoma, consisting of 162.85 acres. By tfie terms of tfie agreement $500.00 was to be paid upon execution and delivery of tfie contract, $12,000.00 to be paid in cash on or before five days from tfie date thereof, and tfie remaining $15,-500.00 was to be payable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Shackeltow v. SebreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wells v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Kuhlman v. WiebenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. James v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Bernard v. McRaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Reuck v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API