Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1929No. 16606PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, O.

In the trial court the parties in this cause occupied reverse positions, and accordingly they will be so referred to hero.

Plaintiff’s action is predicated on a contract of insurance. In his petition, omitting formal parts, plaintiff alleged :

“That on the 3rd day of May, 1923, the defendant, for a valuable consideration paid to it by the plaintiff, to wit, $55.50, executed and delivered to plaintiff its certain policy of insurance in the sum of $1,000, insuring against loss by theft and other perils, for a period of 12 months from date, a certain automobile owned by the plaintiff, to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  3. Northwestern National Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. RoysdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Continental Insurance v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. In Re Graham's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. American Home Fire Assur. v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API