Schock v. Fish
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee Qountyj Wade 8. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Little Fish against Elmer E. Schock and L. Y. Bebee. Judgment for plaintiff, .and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.
The parties will be denominated here as they were in the trial court. Plaintiff filed his petition against defendants, alleging, in substance, that he is a citizen of the Creek Nation, and the father of Mahala Pish, nee Hickman, Katie Pish, nee Williams, and Winey Pish, Billy Pish, and Miley Pish; that Billy Pish died intestate in October, 1900, while a minor; that on the 23 d day of August, 1902, the land in controversey was allotted in his name as his share of the allottable lands of the Creek Nation; that on the 28th day of Pebruary, 1910, he, together with his children, Winey, Mahala,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Miller v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Lewis v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hope v. BourlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Clark v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.